Skip to main content
D. Arizona· 3/15/2019

Ramirez v. Kingman Hosp. Inc.

Citations

  • 374 F. Supp. 3d 832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining plaintiff 16 claiming age discrimination under the ADEA is not required to show age was the “but-for” 17 cause of the adverse employment action on summary judgment
  • finding 20 employer’s failure to document meetings with employee or add anything to employee’s 21 personnel file regarding his productivity issues, which was one of the asserted reasons for 22 his termination, was evidence of pretext
  • “Exhausting 19 administrative remedies by filing a timely charge with the EEOC or the appropriate state 20 agency is a statutory pre-requisite for an employee to pursue litigation under both Title VII 21 and the ADEA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.