Skip to main content

Hughes v. State

Citations

  • 243 Md. App. 187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “after a defendant has received a final judgment in the form of a conviction and sentencing, the State may not enter a nolle prosequi to alter the final judgment” (quoting State v. Simms, 456 Md. 551, 578 (2017))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.