Skip to main content

Rainey v. State

Citations

  • 227 A.3d 1137
  • 246 Md. App. 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[b]efore a court applies [a Crawford] analysis to determine whether [the evidence] is ‘testimonial,’ it must first answer a predicate question—whether the [evidence] is hearsay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thieme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.