D. Minnesota· 4/12/2005
Rainbow Play Systems, Inc. v. Groundscape Technologies, LLC
Citations
- 364 F. Supp. 2d 1026
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6633
- 2005 WL 858170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Claims for deceptive trade practices under Minnesota statute require the same analysis as claims under [the] federal Lanham Act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.D. Minnesota· 2009-07-24· cited 17×
- Coyne's & Co., Inc. v. ENESCO, LLCD. Minnesota· 2008-06-21· cited 7×
- Soilworks, LLC v. Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc.D. Arizona· 2008-08-07· cited 7×
- Intertape Polymer Corp. v. Inspired Technologies, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2010-07-14· cited 4×
- Healthmate International, LLC v. FrenchW.D. Missouri· 2017-06-01· cited 1×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 687×
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-03-20· cited 507×
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court· 1947-04-28· cited 258×
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 248×
- Squirtco, Cross-Appellee v. The Seven-Up Company, a Missouri Corporation and Seven-Up U.S.A., Inc., a Missouri Corporation, Cross-AppellantsEighth Circuit· 1980-08-20· cited 241×
- Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith CorporationEighth Circuit· 1990-06-01· cited 220×
- Lindy Pen Company, Inc. Blackfeet Plastics, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Bic Pen Corporation, Cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1993-01-14· cited 211×
- Aromatique, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gold Seal, Inc., and Darrell Bufford, Appellants/cross-AppelleesEighth Circuit· 1994-09-20· cited 162×
- Otis Clapp & Son, Inc. v. Filmore Vitamin Company D/B/A Medique ProductsSeventh Circuit· 1985-02-04· cited 153×
- Basf Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Old World Trading Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1994-11-16· cited 149×
- The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. v. The Bridgewater Candle Company, LLCFirst Circuit· 2001-08-06· cited 130×
- Transclean Corporation, James P. Viken, Jon A. Lang, and Donald E. Johnson v. Bridgewood Services, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 2002-07-02· cited 114×
- Hubbard Feeds, Inc. v. Animal Feed Supplement, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1999-07-07· cited 111×
- Janice E. Palesch v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsEighth Circuit· 2000-11-21· cited 107×
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-30· cited 106×
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationEighth Circuit· 1997-06-05· cited 89×
- Guinness Import Company v. Mark Vii Distributors, Inc., Third-Party v. Desnoes & Geddes, Ltd., Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1998-10-06· cited 83×
- Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Marion Merrell Dow, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1996-08-22· cited 78×
- Porous Media Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pall Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantEighth Circuit· 1999-04-09· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.