Skip to main content
· 1/14/1993

Lindy Pen Company, Inc. Blackfeet Plastics, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Bic Pen Corporation, Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 982 F.2d 1400
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 673
  • 25 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1570
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 309
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Lanham Act damages for infringement are \subject to equitable principles.\
  • noting that plaintiff bears burden of establishing gross profits from infringing activity with reasonable certainty
  • stating that an accounting of profits will be granted only in light of equitable considerations
  • explaining that courts “generally apply forceful labels such as ‘deliberate,’ ‘false,’ ‘misleading,’ or ‘fraudulent’ to conduct” that constitutes “willful infringement”
  • noting that when proving lost profits is too difficult “a court may award damages based on defendant’s profits on the theory of unjust enrichment.”
  • affirming district court’s denial of attorney fees where infringement not intentional and nothing else made case exceptional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sneed, Nelson, Roll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.