Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/27/1982
Ragan v. State
Citations
- 642 S.W.2d 489
- 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that oral statements of the accused must be recorded in order to be admissible
- requiring that oral statements of the accused must be recorded in order to be admissible
- \It is doubtful that Texas law recognizes such a thing as being placed under formal arrest.\
- “It is doubtful that Texas law recognizes such a thing as being placed under formal arrest.”
- Tex. Code Crim. Proc.Ann. art. 38.22, § 3 (Vernon 1979) requiring that oral statements of the accused during custodial interrogations must be recorded in order to be admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts and Odom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shiflet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-09· cited 264×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-22· cited 197×
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 183×
- People v. FikeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-05-22· cited 165×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-21· cited 119×
- Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-24· cited 82×
- State v. KekonaHawaii Supreme Court· 1994-12-05· cited 57×
- People v. RaibonColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-06-04· cited 38×
- State v. BuzzellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-12-14· cited 35×
- In the Interest of R. J. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-09-16· cited 7×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-10-21· cited 5×
- Ex Parte: Bennie RobertTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2009-08-19
- Suzanne Elizabeth Wexler v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2019-08-27
- Wexler, Suzanne ElizabethCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2021-06-30
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 68×
- Ancira v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-12-18· cited 57×
- Newberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-14· cited 47×
- Alfaro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-15· cited 38×
- Loar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-03-18· cited 34×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-04-19· cited 17×
- Harper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-18· cited 16×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-06· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.