Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/14/2011

Mills v. Fischer

Citations

  • 645 F.3d 176
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14320
  • 2011 WL 2726053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ʺ[A] litigant barred from proceeding 16 under § 1915 is likewise ineligible for the benefits provided therein.ʺ
  • claims dismissed because of judicial immunity are frivolous for the purpose of the IFP statute
  • “Any claim dismissed on the ground of absolute judicial immunity is ‘frivolous’ for purposes of [the in forma pauperis statute].”
  • “Any claim dismissed on the ground of absolute judicial immunity is ‘frivolous’ for purposes of [the in forma pauperis statute].”
  • “Any claim dismissed on the ground of absolute judicial immunity is ‘frivolous’ for purposes of [the in forma pauperis statute].”
  • claims dismissed because of judicial immunity are frivolous for the purpose of the IFP statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Winter, McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mills v. Fischer

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.