· 7/2/1992
Rabideau v. Management Adjustment Bureau
Citations
- 805 F. Supp. 1086
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20604
- 1992 WL 308853
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that two collection letters, first of which stated immediate payment would avoid further contact and second of which stated debt must be paid within five days to avoid further collection efforts, contradicted validation notice
- “allowing at least one day for delivery” of collection letter in FDCPA claim and 30-day period is triggered by receipt of same
- “continuing efforts to collect the debt may occur within the thirty day period”
- expert testimony allowed on typography and placement of information
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Foschio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.