Skip to main content
· 7/2/1992

Rabideau v. Management Adjustment Bureau

Citations

  • 805 F. Supp. 1086
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20604
  • 1992 WL 308853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that two collection letters, first of which stated immediate payment would avoid further contact and second of which stated debt must be paid within five days to avoid further collection efforts, contradicted validation notice
  • “allowing at least one day for delivery” of collection letter in FDCPA claim and 30-day period is triggered by receipt of same
  • “continuing efforts to collect the debt may occur within the thirty day period”
  • expert testimony allowed on typography and placement of information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foschio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.