· 10/18/2002
Peter v. GC Services L.P.
Citations
- 310 F.3d 344
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21716
- 2002 WL 31341531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the letter did not violate § 1692g because it did not demand payment within less than 30-days
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Duhé, Dennis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.