· 2/22/1995
Beeman v. Lacy, Katzen, Ryen & Mittleman
Citations
- 892 F. Supp. 405
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2186
- 1995 WL 79579
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not improper to demand payment in collection letter, so long as letter “clearly expresses] to the consumer that [her] rights to dispute the validity of the debt and to demand verification exist despite the debt collector’s right to demand payment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pooler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.