Skip to main content
· 2/22/1995

Beeman v. Lacy, Katzen, Ryen & Mittleman

Citations

  • 892 F. Supp. 405
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2186
  • 1995 WL 79579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not improper to demand payment in collection letter, so long as letter “clearly expresses] to the consumer that [her] rights to dispute the validity of the debt and to demand verification exist despite the debt collector’s right to demand payment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.