Russey v. Rankin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter “clearly threaten[ed] litigation” when it purported to be from an attorney and declared that “we have the legal right to file a lawsuit”
• finding the defendant violated 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e, 1692e(5), 1692e(10) and 1692f by engaging in collection activity without a license and noting “this district has held that collection activity which violates state law violates the FDCPA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).