Qzo, Inc. v. Moyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by striking appellant's answer in response to appellant's intentional defiance of the trial court's temporary restraining order and his willful destruction of evidence
• holding the trial court properly considered the severity of the sanction when it struck a pleading based on the appellant's intentional defiance of the trial court's order and his willful destruction of evidence
• stating the issue of whether the appellant's failure to comply with a circuit court order was willful presented a credibility issue for the circuit court to decide
• affirming the trial court's sanction of striking the appellant's answer and declaring him in default due to the appellant's separate findings by the circuit court and they were not conflicting. As to Rule 37(f

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).