· 10/5/1992
Southern Plastics Co. v. Southern Commerce Bank
Citations
- 423 S.E.2d 128
- 310 S.C. 256
- 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1085
- 1992 S.C. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an out-of-state bank’s single act of issuing a letter of credit to a South Carolina beneficiary insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction over the bank
- noting the unilateral actions of another cannot confer personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant
- “If either prong fails, the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant fails to comport with the requirements of due process.”
- “This ‘purposeful availment’ requirement ensures that a defendant will not be haled into a jurisdiction solely as a result of random, fortuitous, or attenuated contacts.”
- same, but with additional focus on the due process portion of the analysis
- \The plaintiff bears the burden of satisfying both tests.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Toal, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.