Skip to main content
· 10/5/1992

Southern Plastics Co. v. Southern Commerce Bank

Citations

  • 423 S.E.2d 128
  • 310 S.C. 256
  • 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1085
  • 1992 S.C. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an out-of-state bank’s single act of issuing a letter of credit to a South Carolina beneficiary insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction over the bank
  • noting the unilateral actions of another cannot confer personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant
  • “If either prong fails, the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant fails to comport with the requirements of due process.”
  • “This ‘purposeful availment’ requirement ensures that a defendant will not be haled into a jurisdiction solely as a result of random, fortuitous, or attenuated contacts.”
  • same, but with additional focus on the due process portion of the analysis
  • \The plaintiff bears the burden of satisfying both tests.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Toal, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.