District of Columbia· 4/27/2005
Qualls v. Rumsfeld
Citations
- 228 F.R.D. 8
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7179
- 2005 WL 975742
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- opining that neither the scrutiny and criticism that can alter the way a plaintiff is viewed by coworkers and friends nor “unsubstantiated fears of retaliatory actions by higher-ups” justify pseudonymity
- approving protective order covering personal financial 9 information, juvenile court records, and other private information
- “None of the evidence demonstrates that Doe plaintiffs are likely to face physical retaliation as a result of filing this lawsuit; therefore, they cannot proceed under pseudonyms.”
- “Doe plaintiffs’ general fears, like the declarations, do not persuade the Court of a need for pseudonymous litigation.”
- “fears of embarrassment or vague, unsubstantiated fears of retaliatory actions . . . do not permit a plaintiff to proceed under a pseudonym”
- “None of the evidence demonstrates that Doe plaintiffs are likely to face physical retaliation as a result of filing this lawsuit; therefore, they cannot proceed under pseudonyms.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Doe v. CabreraDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-10· cited 57×
- Doe v. Pittsylvania CountyW.D. Virginia· 2012-02-03· cited 39×
- Doe v. George Wash. Univ.D.C. Circuit· 2019-03-27· cited 30×
- National Ass'n of Waterfront Employers v. ChaoDistrict of Columbia· 2008-11-13· cited 28×
- Klayman v. ObamaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-21· cited 26×
- Roe v. Bernabei & Wachtel PllcDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-26· cited 25×
- United States of America Ex Rel Sanjay Grover v. Related Companies, L.P.District of Columbia· 2013-11-14· cited 15×
- Sandberg v. VincentD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-09· cited 8×
- Smith v. SummersD.C. Circuit· 2018-09-24· cited 7×
- Roe v. DoeDistrict of Columbia· 2018-08-09
- Sandberg v. VincentDistrict of Columbia· 2019-04-23
- Tolton v. Jones DayDistrict of Columbia· 2019-09-11
- Valle v. KaragounisDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-16
- Federal Trade Commission v. Match Group, Inc.District of Columbia· 2023-05-01
- John Doe v. Jane DoeFourth Circuit· 2023-10-26
- Doe v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeD. New Hampshire· 2018-05-02
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedFourth Circuit· 1993-10-04· cited 455×
- Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaEleventh Circuit· 1992-01-24· cited 385×
- Doe v. StegallFifth Circuit· 1981-08-10· cited 298×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1979-07-30· cited 163×
- Cowley v. PulsiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-06-27· cited 163×
- John Doe v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1991-07-16· cited 48×
- Qualls v. RumsfeldDistrict of Columbia· 2005-02-07· cited 42×
- Does I Through III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2003-06-18· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.