Qualls v. Rumsfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the United States was at war in Iraq
• contesting active duty order based on allegation that term of enlistment had been improperly extended
• “[T]he facts suggest that the United States is at war at the behest of Congress.”
• “When moving the court for a preliminary injunction, plaintiffs bear the burdens of production and persuasion.”
• “When moving the court for a preliminary injunction, plaintiffs bear the burdens of production and persuasion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).