Skip to main content

Lopez v. State

Citations

  • 861 A.2d 1245
  • 2004 Del. LEXIS 542
  • 2004 WL 2743545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no error in refusing the defendant’s request to represent himself where he became disruptive and refused to follow the procedures for waiving his right to counsel
  • “This deferential standard applies not only to historical facts that are based upon credibility determinations but also to findings of historical fact that are based on physical or documentary evidence or inferences from other facts.”
  • “In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.