Pulliam v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• right to pro se defense is not absolute once trial begins; trial court has discretion to balance alleged prejudice to defendant against potential disruption and delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Aov Industries, Inc., Hubert R. Bruce, Appeal of Hawley Fuel Coalmart, Inc. And Hawley Fuel Coal, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1986-08-22· cited 217×
• State v. Bergin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-24· cited 83×
• Demers v. State
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-09-13· cited 79×
• United States v. James Oakey
  Seventh Circuit· 1988-10-04· cited 56×
• Frank J. Carozza v. United States Steel Corporation and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
  Third Circuit· 1984-02-10· cited 41×
• State v. Bolden
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-04-17· cited 21×
• Goodman v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1988-01-14· cited 12×
• Meachem v. Keane
  S.D. New York· 1995-09-12· cited 10×
• Barney Earl Crutchfield v. Louie L. Wainwright, Jim Smith
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-10-03· cited 6×
• Koppers Co., Inc. v. American Exp. Co.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-05-19· cited 2×
• Ferreri v. Mainardi
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-08-02· cited 2×