Supreme Court· 5/14/1984

Pulliam v. Allen

Citations

466 U.S. 522
104 S. Ct. 1970
80 L. Ed. 2d 565
1984 U.S. LEXIS 75
52 U.S.L.W. 4525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \judicial immunity is not a bar to prospective injune-tive relief against a judicial officer acting in her judicial capacity\
holding that absolute judicial immunity does not bar prospective injunctive relief under § 1983 against a state-court judge acting in a judicial capacity
holding that absolute judicial immunity does not bar prospective injunctive relief under Sec. 1983 against a state-court judge acting in a judicial capacity
holding that judicial immunity was not a bar to awards of attorney's fees and costs or to demands for injunctive relief
holding that clear legislative intent is required to abrogate common-law principles of legislative and judicial immunity
holding that clear legislative intent is required to abrogate common-law principles of legislative and judicial immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Brennan, White, Marshall, Stevens, Powell, Burger, Rehnquist, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

461 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pulliam v. Allen

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.