Goodman v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing churning claims where plaintiff “received confirmations of the trades that occurred in her accounts as well as account statements on a regular basis [but] never examined a single one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).