Larry Bolin, Kenneth David Pealock v. Richard W. Story

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “expect where pervasive bias is shown, a judge’s rulings in the same or related case are not sufficient basis for recusal”
• holding that federal judges are entitled to “absolute immunity” from suit
• noting that in addition to appeals, a plaintiff may seek an extraordinary writ, such as a writ of mandamus
• stating that “it is well settled that the allegation of bias must show that the bias is personal as distinguished from judicial in nature” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• stating that “it is well settled that the allegation of bias must show that the bias is personal as distinguished from judicial in nature” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• stating that “it is well settled that the allega- tion of bias must show that the bias is personal as distinguished from judicial in nature” (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).