Skip to main content

Puckett v. State

Citations

  • 879 So. 2d 920
  • 2004 WL 1171707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim for relief “must be alleged with specificity” and that a “conclusory allegation” is insufficient to survive summary dismissal under section 99-39-11(2)
  • “Moreover, jurors generally may not impeach their own verdict by testifying about motives or influences affecting deliberations.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Lewis v. State, 725 So. 2d 183, 190-91 (Miss. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.