Mississippi Supreme Court· 8/28/2008
Howell v. State
Citations
- 989 So. 2d 372
- 2008 WL 3931398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The fact that a witness changes his testimony after the trial does not necessarily entitle the petitioner to a new trial.”
- “The fact that a witness changes his testimony after the trial does not necessarily entitle the petitioner to a new trial.”
- “As a general rule, recanted testimony is exceedingly unreliable, and is regarded with suspicion; and it is the right and duty of the court to deny a new trial where it is not satisfied that such testimony is true.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: En Banc
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cherry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2010-01-05· cited 22×
- Marlon Latodd Howell v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2014-10-09· cited 21×
- Kelvin D. Ashford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2017-06-08· cited 19×
- Brandon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2013-02-05· cited 12×
- Minor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2012-06-07· cited 9×
- Esco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2012-06-12· cited 8×
- Muise v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2008-12-16· cited 7×
- Nathaniel Cooper v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2016-08-16· cited 6×
- Timothy B. Sharp v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2014-12-16· cited 5×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2011-06-14· cited 4×
- Rustin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2014-05-13· cited 4×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2014-02-25· cited 3×
- Tard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2013-02-12· cited 2×
- Charlie Ricardo Grant v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2016-03-15· cited 1×
- Pruitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2012-01-17· cited 1×
- Antonio Hall a/k/a Antonio Kentrell Hall v. State of Mississippi;Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2019-12-17
- Tasha Mercedez Shelby a/k/a Tasha Shelby v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2020-08-04
- Detrius Roberson v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2022-06-28
- Tameshia Shelton a/k/a Tamesha Shelton a/k/a Mikey v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2025-12-09
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 906×
- Stringer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-08-15· cited 648×
- Byrom v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-10-16· cited 320×
- Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-12-05· cited 290×
- Youngblood v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 288×
- Howell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-10-23· cited 267×
- Mohr v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-08-07· cited 256×
- Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 230×
- Goodin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 178×
- Cabello v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-04-06· cited 175×
- Green v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-01-20· cited 131×
- Tate v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 124×
- Wiley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-06-03· cited 106×
- Russell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 99×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.