Hoops v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining how, as used in jury instructions, “[t]he phrase ‘knowingly and wilfully’ contemplates that the accused must act with knowledge and deliberation; therefore, the instruction does not deem mere knowledge sufficient to find one guilty”
• instruction was identical to S-3 and did not contain second paragraph similar to Berry
• jury is presumed to have followed trial judge's admonition to disregard witness's inappropriate remarks
• jury is presumed to have followed trial judge's admonition to disregard witness's inappropriate remarks
• instruction was identical to S-3 and did not contain second paragraph similar to Berry
• \It would be folly for this Court to hold that affiliation or membership with a street gang such as this one does not constitute a bad act as contemplated by Miss. R. Evid. 404(b).\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).