Skip to main content

Provenzano v. State

Citations

  • 616 So. 2d 428
  • 1993 WL 32307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]here is no qudy violation . . . where the _19_ defense . . . had the information”
  • explaining that \[t]here is no Brady violation ... where the defense ... had the information\
  • finding no suppression where the State’s expert referenced his notes at trial and used them while testifying
  • finding no suppression where the State’s expert referenced his notes at trial and used them while testifying
  • no Brady violation where defendant could have obtained his jail records from jail officials and could have reviewed the notes of the State expert witness if he had requested them
  • “There is no Brady violation where the information is equally accessible to the defense and the prosecution, or where the defense either had the information or could have obtained it through the exercise of reasonable diligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.