Prohias v. Pfizer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs “obviously believe[d] that they continue[d] to receive benefits from [a medical product], notwithstanding any alleged limitations as to its efficacy” because they “continue[d] to pay the price charged by” the manufacturers and distributors
• “[T]o state a claim under [Florida law, Plaintiff] must allege, at a minimum, that she has been aggrieved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).