Leslie Block Kaye v. Marc E. Grossman, Laura Anne Grossman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under New York law, a claim for unjust enrichment demands that a plaintiff allege “1
• reversing unjust enrichment verdict against wife of lawyer who embezzled funds from plaintiff
• dismissing unjust enrichment claim against wife whose husband received a loan because the wife’s alleged receipt of an “indirect benefit from the loan” did “not establish the specific and direct benefit necessary to support an unjust enrichment claim”
• “A fraud verdict may not rest on allegations of speculative or remote injury to the plaintiff.”
• “Laura ‘acknowledged that the money was lent to the family’ and told Kaye that ‘but for [Kaye’s] loan, her daughter would not have been able to continue at Duke University.’ ”
• listing the same three elements for a promissory estoppel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).