Wyoming Supreme Court· 9/3/2008
Proffit v. State
Citations
- 2008 WY 103
- 191 P.3d 974
- 2008 Wyo. LEXIS 108
- 2008 WL 4057537
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The burden is on the appellant to establish an abuse of discretion.”
- The defendant did not request an instruction limiting the purpose of a post-motive consistent 4 statement; therefore, the “district court was not legally obligated to give one, and no error [could] be premised on its failure to do so.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Golden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 38×
- Foster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2010-01-28· cited 25×
- William C. Forbes and Julia Forbes, Trustees of the Beckton Ranch Trust U/A/D April 1, 1920Wyoming Supreme Court· 2015-01-23· cited 24×
- Philippe Lajaunie, individually and derivatively as a member of Beartooth Mountain Springs, LLC and American Summits, LLCWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-12-10· cited 20×
- Hunter Lee Hicks v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-01-06· cited 16×
- Greg Herrick Richard Sugden, M.D. Christian Andersen Brent Blue, M.D. Teton Avjet, LLC and Wyoming Jet Center, LLC v. Jackson Hole Airport Board and Jackson Hole AviationWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-11-26· cited 16×
- Callen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2008-09-12· cited 15×
- Garner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-11-16· cited 13×
- Stocki v. NunnWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-05-27· cited 12×
- Washington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-09-20· cited 10×
- Delbert R. McDowell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-02-11· cited 9×
- Craft v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2012-12-28· cited 9×
- Nelson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2009-03-11· cited 6×
- Maier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2012-04-05· cited 5×
- David Wayne Munda v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-09-18· cited 5×
- BRUYETTE v. WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-06-24· cited 3×
- Northern Arapaho Tribe, a Federally-Recognized Indian Tribe and the Wind River Hotel & Casino, an Enterprise Wholly Owned By an Arm of the Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Baldwin, Crocker & Rudd, P.C. and Kelly RuddWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-10-24· cited 1×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 87×
- Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-02-19· cited 85×
- Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 85×
- Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-10-30· cited 62×
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-10-25· cited 55×
- Ogden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-11-08· cited 55×
- Trujillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-04-09· cited 50×
- Bunting v. JamiesonWyoming Supreme Court· 1999-07-16· cited 49×
- Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2006-03-31· cited 44×
- Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2006-12-15· cited 39×
- Wilde v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-08-13· cited 39×
- Montoya v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-12-09· cited 37×
- Law v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-09-24· cited 35×
- Dike v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1999-11-30· cited 35×
- Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-03-22· cited 31×
- Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-09-07· cited 26×
- Szymanski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-08-29· cited 26×
- Humphrey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2008-06-16· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.