Skip to main content

Proffit v. State

Citations

  • 2008 WY 103
  • 191 P.3d 974
  • 2008 Wyo. LEXIS 108
  • 2008 WL 4057537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The burden is on the appellant to establish an abuse of discretion.”
  • The defendant did not request an instruction limiting the purpose of a post-motive consistent 4 statement; therefore, the “district court was not legally obligated to give one, and no error [could] be premised on its failure to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Golden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.