Bunting v. Jamieson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the two-part analysis from Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592–93 and related cases
• adopting the two-part analysis from Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592–93 and related cases
• \primary goal of Daubert's gatekeeping requirement 'is to ensure the reliability and relevancy of expert testimony' \
• “We now expressly adopt the analysis provided by Daubert and its progeny as guidance for the Wyoming courts’ determination whether to admit or exclude expert testimony.”
• formally adopting in Wyoming the four non-exclusive tests to the facts at hand enunciated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 509 U.S. 579, 592-94, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2796-97, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)
• “We now expressly adopt the analysis provided by Daubert [v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)] and its progeny as guidance for the Wyoming courts’ determination whether to admit or exclude expert testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).