Skip to main content

Proctor v. State

Citations

  • 76 Ark. App. 48
  • 60 S.W.3d 486
  • 2001 Ark. App. LEXIS 823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • three judges found violations of both the Confrontation Clause and Ark. R. Evid. 804 (2001); whereas, three concurring judges found only a violation of Rule 804 and three dissenting judges found no violation of either Rule 804 or the Confrontation Clause
  • three judges found violations of both the Confrontation Clause and Ark. R. Evid. 804 (2001); whereas, three concurring judges found only a violation of Rule 804 and three dissenting judges found no violation of either Rule 804 or the Confrontation Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agree, Griffen, Hart, Hays, Jennings, Neal, Pittman, Robbins, Stroud, Vaught

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.