Scroggins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of Scroggins’s previous drug sale was admissible to show his intent to deliver drugs in exchange for money
• holding that evidence of Scroggins's previous drug sale was admissible to show his intent to deliver drugs in exchange for money
• holding prior testimony was admissible where the witness who first testified during a suppression hearing was murdered after he testified, where the defendant was represented by counsel who had extensively cross-examined the witness
• prior drug sales admissible to show intent when charged with delivery of a controlled substance
• prior drug sales admissible to show intent when charged with delivery of a controlled substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).