Skip to main content

Daniel v. State

Citations

  • 526 N.E.2d 1157
  • 1988 Ind. LEXIS 231
  • 1988 WL 85643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the State's late filing of its habitual offender allegation
  • stating defendant \may not now complain of an inadequate opportunity to prepare his defense as he did not move for a continuance on the ground that the State's amendment of the original information through its filing of the habitual offender allegation prejudiced his rights.\
  • “As no objection was made at trial to the late filing . . . , this allegation of error has been waived.”
  • discussing Ind. Code § 35-34-1-5(b)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Shepard, Debruler, Givan, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.