United States v. Russell Bufalino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a tape recording of an extortion threat that contained several obscenities was not highly prejudicial
• finding that the defendant’s repeated requests for continuances suggested “sandbagging”
• defendant failed to respond to government’s motion to sequester and is charged with the delay, but government rebuked for standing silent and reminded of its responsibility to pursue a prosecution
• exclusion of time for co-defendant’s bail hearing four days after arraignment
• exclusions for motions under original indictment, carried over to superseding indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).