· 4/7/2011
Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Reese
Citations
- 637 F.3d 1220
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7126
- 2011 WL 1316172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Congress could have but did not give the state the role of “final arbiter” over medical necessity
- providing an exhaustive summary of the statutory and regulation system governing the provision of PDN services to medically fragile children
- “Accordingly, even if a category of medical services or treatments is mandatory under the Medicaid Act, participating states must provide those medical services or treatments for Medicaid recipients only if they are ‘medically necessary.’”
- “Accordingly, even if a category of medical services or treatments is mandatory under the Medicaid Act, participating states must provide those medical services or treatments for Medicaid recipients only if they are ‘medically necessary.’”
- “Accordingly, even if a category of medical services or treatments is mandatory under the Medicaid Act, participating states must provide those medical services or treatments for Medicaid recipients only if they are ‘medically necessary.’”
- “A state is obligated to provide EPSDT- eligible children with private duty nursing services, but only to the extent that they are medically necessary.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hull, Marcus, Whittemore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.