Skip to main content

Powell v. Powell

Citations

  • 124 S.W.3d 100
  • 2003 Tenn. App. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the appellant’s contention that valuing a business interest posed a question of law requiring de novo review
  • “The factors are not listed in order of importance, and each is to be considered in relation to the specific facts of each case.”
  • “If the evidence of value is conflicting, the trial judge may assign a value that is within the range of values supported by the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farmer, Hayes, Murchison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.