Melody Crunk Telfer v.George Curtiss Telfer

Citations

• 558 S.W.3d 643

Syllabus

This appeal arises from a divorce case that was appealed and remanded and now once again is back before us. Melody Crunk Telfer (\Wife\) filed for divorce from husband George Curtiss Telfer (\Husband\) in 2010. A final decree of divorce was entered in 2012. Husband appealed the finding that he lacked a marital interest in two of Wife's business entities. This Court found that the appreciation in value of the entities at issue was marital property subject to equitable division. On remand, the Chancery Court for Williamson County (\the Remand Court\) valued the appreciation, divided the marital estate, and awarded Husband attorney's fees. Husband appeals to this Court. We find, inter alia, that the approximately 84/16 division of the marital estate in favor of Wife rendered by the Remand Court is inequitable in light of the evidence and the relevant statutory factors. We vacate that portion of the Remand Court's order and remand for a fresh division of the marital estate on a 65/35 basis in favor of Wife. We otherwise affirm the Remand Court.