Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 10/25/2010
James v. James
Citations
- 344 S.W.3d 915
- 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 660
- 2010 WL 4225832
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In this case, notwithstanding the trial court’s insertion of comments and remarks during the hearing of this matter, Ms. James’ failure to request recusal of the trial court until after the court rendered its judgment operates as a waiver.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge David R. Farmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wells v. Tennessee Board of RegentsTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-12-20· cited 551×
- Herrera v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-10-14· cited 291×
- Burlew v. BurlewTennessee Supreme Court· 2001-02-20· cited 255×
- Owens v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2007-04-19· cited 251×
- Sullivan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-09-05· cited 101×
- Gotwald v. GotwaldCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1988-11-09· cited 55×
- Broesche v. JacobsonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-03-08· cited 52×
- Powell v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2003-04-07· cited 49×
- Spain v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1980-07-25· cited 45×
- Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-03-24· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.