Lasky v. Itzler (In Re Itzler)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]nder Florida law, even a pure default judgment, which arose from no participation of the defendant, is sufficient to meet the ‘fully litigated’ element of collateral estoppel.”
• “The dicta in Perez persuades this Court that every allegation in the state court complaint, including the Laskys’ fraud claim, was conclusively established as true by entry of the default judgment.”
• “The fact that Itzler did not participate at all in the state court action does not change the fact that the issue of fraud was ‘fully litigated’ under Florida collateral estoppel principles.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).