Greene v. Stevens Gas Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he applicable statute prohibits such limitation clauses only if they set a 11 time limit less than a year from the date of the loss’’
• stating that “[p]laintiff and amicus curiae, the Vermont Attorney General, argue that Wilder is no longer good law after the 1985 amendments to the Consumer Fraud Act. We do not reach this argument.”
• explaining that while “the nonmoving party is entitled to the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences,” V.R.C.P. 56(e) requires the nonmoving party, when a motion for summary -8- judgment is made and supported, to respond with specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial
• order denying motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).