Skip to main content
· 10/27/1989

Peabody v. P.J.'s Auto Village, Inc.

Citations

  • 569 A.2d 460
  • 153 Vt. 55
  • 1989 Vt. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that deception is measured by an objective standard focusing on the risk of harm to the consumer in a given case
  • Court sets forth three-part test explaining the words “deceptive acts or practices” in 9 V.S.A. § 2453(a)
  • Court sets forth three-part test explaining the words \deceptive acts or practices\ in 9 V.S.A. § 2453(a)
  • actual damages are not necessary for a plaintiff to prevail in a consumer fraud action
  • trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s consumer fraud claim based on its conclusion that defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff that used car he was buying had been “clipped” was not material because it did not affect reliability, safety, or value of vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Morse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.