Skip to main content

Potts v. State

Citations

  • 376 S.E.2d 851
  • 259 Ga. 96
  • 1989 Ga. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing jurors to take notes
  • finding that the defendant \withdrew his request after the trial court gave him time to reconsider and reflect on the consequences of self-representation\
  • offering to “give dead bodies” admissible to show character even if the defendant had not committed additional murders
  • in absence of trial transcript, requirement of Pope satisfied by testimony of witnesses from original trial to prove commission of crime
  • in absence of trial transcript, requirement of Pope satisfied by testimony of witnesses from original trial to prove commission of crime
  • no denial of right to self-representation where accused unequivocally withdrew his request to proceed pro se after having been informed of the dangers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.