Skip to main content
· 3/13/2012

Potter v. Toei Animation Incorporated

Citations

  • 839 F. Supp. 2d 49
  • 2012 WL 826899
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing claim that “never assert[ed] anything about a distinctive or secondary meaning”
  • “In the District of Columbia Circuit, it is established that an argument in a dispositive motion that the opponent fails to address in an opposition may be deemed conceded.”
  • “In the District of Columbia Circuit, it is established that an argument in a dispositive motion that the opponent fails to address in an opposition may be deemed conceded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.