Skip to main content

Potter v. Pohlad

Citations

  • 560 N.W.2d 389
  • 1997 Minn. App. LEXIS 257
  • 1997 WL 87860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conclusory statements of an expert cannot sustain a claim
  • affirming summary judgment and stating that “the conclusory statements of an expert cannot sustain [appellant’s] claim”
  • “The fiduciary duties of a corporation’s officers and directors are generally governed by the law of the state of incorporation.”
  • busi-ness judgment rule does not apply to officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Peterson, Mansur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.