Skip to main content

Zirn v. VLI Corp.

Citations

  • 681 A.2d 1050
  • 1996 Del. LEXIS 320
  • 1996 WL 523799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “soft information,” such as asset valuations or income and cash-flow projections, must be disclosed only when its reliability and materiality outweigh the potential for shareholder confusion
  • holding that the directors were shielded from liability by the Section 102(b)(7
  • holding that directors were exculpated from liability under Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL for breach of fiduciary duty arising from allegedly misleading disclosures where the disclosures “were made in good faith”
  • holding that breach of care claim is barred with § 102(b)(7) waiver provision
  • observing that the goal of disclosure is “to provide a balanced and truthful account of those matters which are discussed in a corporation’s disclosure materials.”
  • finding that Section 102(b)(7) shielded directors from liability for disclosure violations that resulted from good faith errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Zirn v. VLI Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.