Skip to main content
· 11/1/1993

prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,686 Mary Hayes, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Hayes, Jr., and Eric Hayes v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.

Citations

  • 8 F.3d 88
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28326
  • 1993 WL 433724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the federal rules of evidence regarding expert testimony were not intended \to make summary judgment impossible whenever a party has produced an expert to support its position\
  • concluding that an expert’s affidavit must contain more than a “conelusory assertion about ultimate legal issues” to defeat summary judgment
  • concluding that an expert's affidavit must contain more than a \conclusory assertion about ultimate legal issues\ to defeat summary judgment
  • refusing to “allow the reliance on a bare ultimate expert conclusion to become a free pass to trial”
  • affirming denial of relief under Rule 59(e) where the information on which the movant relied was neither unknown nor unavailable when the opposition to summary judgment was filed
  • affirming denial of relief under Rule 59(e) where the information on which the movant relied was neither unknown nor unavailable when the opposition to summary judgment was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Stahl, Fuste

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.