Skip to main content

Payton v. Abbott Labs

Citations

  • 437 N.E.2d 171
  • 386 Mass. 540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that market share liability theory could not be used to hold named defendants, DES manufacturers, responsible for marketing a prescription drug that injured plaintiffs in útero
  • recognizing rule and emphasizing limited range of emotional claims without physical injury under Agis
  • explaining that to state a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress a plaintiff “must allege and prove she suffered physical harm as a result of the conduct which caused the emotional distress”
  • rejecting application of \market share\ theory inasmuch as \[p]ublic policy favors the development and marketing of new and more efficacious drugs.\
  • rejecting application of “market share” theory inasmuch as “[pjublic policy favors the development and marketing of new and more efficacious drugs.”
  • applying zone of danger doctrine and also requiring that plaintiff suffer severe emotional distress with physical manifestations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Liacos, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

291 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

101 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Payton v. Abbott Labs

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.