Skip to main content
· 6/23/1993

Haynes v. State of Oregon

Citations

  • 854 P.2d 949
  • 121 Or. App. 395
  • 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to determine whether petitioner was prejudiced, “we must resolve the underlying legal issue”
  • failure of defense counsel to assert at trial that parole officer was not a “corrections officer” within the meaning of ORS 163.208(1) demonstrated lack of professional skill and judgment, where the term had not been construed by courts
  • failure of defense counsel to assert at trial that parole officer was not a \corrections officer\ within the meaning of ORS 163.208(1) demonstrated lack of professional skill and judgment, where the term had not been construed by courts
  • to determine prejudice, “we must resolve the underlying legal issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Edmonds, Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.