Skip to main content
· 11/5/1992

Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.

Citations

  • 840 P.2d 700
  • 314 Or. 553
  • 1992 Ore. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating and applying that standard under former ORS 656.390, which authorized sanctions for pursuit of frivolous appeal
  • applying that approach in reviewing sanctions under ORS 656.390
  • setting out objective standard under FRCP 11, on which ORCP 17 was modeled
  • to find if appeal is frivolous the court asks whether argument was one that reasonable lawyer would know was not well-grounded in fact or not warranted by law
  • discussing 1983 version of FRCP 11

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.