Oregon Supreme Court· 11/5/1992
Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.
Citations
- 840 P.2d 700
- 314 Or. 553
- 1992 Ore. LEXIS 212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating and applying that standard under former ORS 656.390, which authorized sanctions for pursuit of frivolous appeal
- applying that approach in reviewing sanctions under ORS 656.390
- setting out objective standard under FRCP 11, on which ORCP 17 was modeled
- to find if appeal is frivolous the court asks whether argument was one that reasonable lawyer would know was not well-grounded in fact or not warranted by law
- discussing 1983 version of FRCP 11
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 26×
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 23×
- Davis v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-22· cited 19×
- Seely v. HansonOregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 16×
- Fechtig v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-17· cited 13×
- Cantua v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-07-12· cited 13×
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-01· cited 9×
- Azorr v. AzorrCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-06-05· cited 7×
- Plere Publishers, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-12· cited 4×
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-16· cited 3×
- Winters v. Woodburn Carcraft Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-10· cited 2×
- Lee v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-03· cited 1×
- Hanggi ex rel. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-01· cited 1×
- Toney v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-06· cited 1×
- Sinio v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-01-31· cited 1×
- Albrecht v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-16
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 811×
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court· 1979-03-20· cited 168×
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 147×
- Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court· 1967-05-17· cited 90×
- Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-20· cited 74×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court· 1991-10-10· cited 63×
- Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court· 1967-06-02· cited 57×
- Porter v. HillOregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-06· cited 37×
- Barrett v. Coast Range PlywoodOregon Supreme Court· 1983-04-06· cited 23×
- Can-Key Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Leasing Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 17×
- Austin v. Sisters of Charity of ProvidenceOregon Supreme Court· 1970-06-17· cited 14×
- Cleland v. WilcoxOregon Supreme Court· 1975-12-26· cited 9×
- Kassahn v. Publishers Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-10-30· cited 7×
- Westfall v. Rust InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-05-29· cited 4×
- Westfall v. Rust InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-10-17· cited 3×
- Westfall v. Rust InternationalOregon Supreme Court· 1991-08-22· cited 3×
- Pea v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court· 1967-12-29· cited 3×
- Westfall v. Rust InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.