Skip to main content

Porquez v. Washington

Citations

  • 492 S.E.2d 665
  • 268 Ga. 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an expert affidavit set forth at least one specific \factually-based act of negligence\ by stating the defendants failed to monitor the use of an emergency medical device
  • discussing purpose of OCGA § 9-11-9.1, which is to reduce the filing of frivolous malpractice suits, and noting that permitting a plaintiff to amend an expert affidavit to meet the requirements of OCGA § 9-11-9.1 helps to insure that a complaint is not frivolous
  • when the expert affidavit is initially filed with the complaint, a plaintiff is allowed to supplement the affidavit if its sufficiency is disputed
  • When an schwannoma, and performed an unnecessary and suboptimal surgery (lumbar laminectomy, durotomy, and intradural exploration). Dr. Rogan failed to aver, however, that, at the time the neurosurgeons diagnosed Fisher’s spinal condition and performed the surgery, he (Dr. Rogan
  • subsequent amendments to an act affirm earlier legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.