Harrison v. Daly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the limited exception for subsequent injury , is confined to those in which the plaintiff remains asymptomatic for a period of time following the misdiagnosis”
• breast cancer patient’s symptoms became worse after the misdiagnosis, so the Whitaker rule did not apply and the claim was barred by the statute of limitation
• \the limited exception for subsequent injury cases . . . is confined to those in which the plaintiff remains asymptomatic for a period of time following the misdiagnosis\
• where the plaintiff experienced pain, lumps in her breast, and increasing breast size from the time of the defendant's failure to diagnose breast cancer until the time of the correct diagnosis, plaintiff did not as a matter of law sustain a subsequent injury under Whitaker v. Zirkle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).