Crosby v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding due to the trial court’s improper striking of Crosby’s expert witness’s testimony regarding the cause of the underlying accident
• stating that “the legislative intent of [OCGA § 40-8-76.1 (d
• stating that “the legislative intent of [OCGA § 40-8-76.1 (d
• “Product misuse d[oes] not relieve the manufacturer from liability for a defective product when such misuse was known by the manufacturer or was reasonably foreseeable by the manufacturer, 22 as alleged in this case.”
• “Product misuse 22 d[oes] not relieve the manufacturer from liability for a defective product when such misuse was known by the manufacturer or was reasonably foreseeable by the manufacturer, as alleged in this case.”
• “The language of the act is plain and unambiguous ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).